Run separately, they compete with each other.
Paid bids on terms you already rank for. Social points at pages search never sees. Three channels, three reports, and no picture of which one actually produced the customer.
So budget gets set annually by argument rather than moved monthly by evidence.
Everything in the search, social & paid scope.
Unified channel strategy
One plan covering search, social and paid, with a shared goal.
Google Ads management
Built, run and continuously pruned.
Meta Ads management
Creative produced and tested at volume.
Organic search
Local and technical SEO underneath the paid work.
Social publishing
Consistent presence across the platforms that matter.
Cross-channel attribution
One picture of which channel actually produced the customer.
Budget reallocation
Money moved between channels continuously, not quarterly.
Single monthly report
One document covering everything, in plain language.
Worth saying who it isn't for.
- ✓You run several channels with separate reporting
- ✓You can't tell which channel produces customers
- ✓You want budget moved by evidence, not annually
- ✓You'd rather have one director than three vendors
- —One channel is clearly working and you just want more of it
- —You want to buy channels à la carte
The first twelve weeks.
- Week 1, Audit
Every channel assessed on one basis, so they can be compared honestly.
- Weeks 2–3, Build
Accounts restructured, tracking unified, first creative and content live.
- Weeks 4–8, Test and shift
Budget moves toward what's producing, continuously.
- Ongoing, Manage and report
One report, one director, all channels.
Human judgment, machine volume.
The plan is made by the marketing director who runs your account. The production work behind it runs on the latest AI technology, configured around your services, your competitors and what you're trying to grow, not a generic tool with your logo on it.
That's why delivery is measured in days where agencies quote months. What stays human is the strategy: your director points every move at more leads.
The failure this service exists to fix.
Run separately, each channel optimises for itself. Paid search bids on terms you already rank for organically, because the ads team is measured on ad conversions and doesn't lose anything by cannibalising your own listing.
Social points at pages search never sees, so content that could have earned twice earns once. Organic targets terms paid could tell it are converting, if the two ever compared notes.
Three reports arrive monthly, each showing acceptable performance, and none of them answers the only question you have: which of these actually produced customers.
Nobody is behaving badly. Each is doing the job it was given. The failure is structural, and it's why buying channels separately costs more than it looks.
Running them under one director with one goal removes the overlap and, in most accounts we take over, immediately frees budget that was being spent twice.
Continuously, not annually.
Most businesses set channel budgets once a year and adjust them in an argument. By the time an underperforming channel is cut, it's usually had eight months to underperform.
The alternative is a single pool allocated by evidence and reviewed continuously. When paid search cost per lead climbs in a seasonal lull and social gets cheaper, money moves that week rather than next January.
That's only possible when the channels share a definition of a result. Half of this work is unglamorous: agreeing what counts as a lead, tracking it identically everywhere, and resisting the temptation to let each platform report on itself.
It also requires the discipline to move money away from something that's been working, which is harder than it sounds when someone's attached to it.
The result is a portfolio rather than a set of subscriptions, and it's the single biggest efficiency available to a business running three or more channels.
What we can and can't tell you.
Attribution is imperfect and anyone selling you certainty is selling you a model with confident assumptions inside it.
What's reasonably knowable: which channel someone last touched, which pages they saw, whether they called or filled in a form, and how those patterns change when spend changes.
What isn't: the exact contribution of a channel that influenced a decision without closing it. Paid social frequently does this, it makes the search ad more likely to be clicked, and no dashboard captures that cleanly.
So we use platform data for direction, business outcomes for truth, and holdout tests where the question actually matters. Turning a channel off in one area and comparing is cruder than a model and considerably more trustworthy.
And we say which numbers are solid and which are inference. A report that presents everything with equal confidence is hiding its weak points, and you'll find them later.
The operational difference.
The standard agency arrangement gives you a different junior specialist per channel, coordinated by an account manager who doesn't execute anything. Every decision crosses at least two people who each know one part.
Ours is one marketing director across all channels, doing the work rather than relaying it. They see the paid data and the organic data and the social data, which is the only way the overlap gets noticed.
That's possible because the production burden is carried by AI systems configured around your account rather than by a team of people. A senior person can hold four channels when they aren't also building every campaign by hand.
Practically it means one person to ring, one report, and answers that account for the whole picture rather than one platform's view of it.
It also means when something isn't working you get told by the person who decided it, not by an account manager relaying it.
The arithmetic.
Bought separately, an SEO agency, a paid search specialist, a social manager, a business typically pays three retainers, gets three reports, and funds three people's coordination time.
Bought together it's one flat fee, one director, and one report. That's less than the usual cost of any two of the three separately, which is most of the reason clients consolidate.
The saving isn't only the fee. It's the spend that stops being duplicated: bidding on terms you already own, promoting content search can't see, paying twice to reach the same person in the same week.
Ad spend stays yours and goes directly to the platforms. We take 0% of it, so nothing about our advice changes when your budget does.
And you can start with one channel and add others. The pricing doesn't punish you for scaling up, which is a deliberate difference from how most agencies structure this.
If you're only doing one thing.
If the phone needs to ring this month, start with paid search. It's the only channel that produces demand capture immediately, and the data it generates makes everything else better informed.
If you're already getting enquiries and want more of them cheaply, start with local organic. It's slower and it doesn't stop when you stop paying.
If people find you and don't choose you, none of the above is the problem. Fix the website and the profile first, more traffic to a page that doesn't convert is a more expensive version of the same result.
If your category isn't searched for at all, start with paid social, because there's no demand to capture and it has to be created.
We'll tell you which of these you are in the first conversation, and it's frequently not the one people expect.
Planning the year properly.
Almost every local category has a season, and most businesses discover theirs by living through it rather than by planning for it.
The useful insight is that the peak in demand is not when the budget should land. Search interest builds weeks before purchase in most categories, so spending at the peak means arriving after the decision has been made.
Running channels together makes this manageable, because the response differs by channel. Paid search can be scaled within days of demand moving; organic and content have to be in place months earlier; social sits between them.
So the annual plan sequences them, content and organic before the build-up, paid during it, retargeting through the tail, rather than treating the year as flat and reacting late.
We pull the seasonal pattern from search data at your geography rather than assuming the national one, because the two frequently differ by weeks.
What you actually receive.
One document rather than three, in plain language rather than a dashboard export.
What was spent, by channel, and what each produced against the target declared at the start. Including the channels that underperformed, named as such.
What changed during the month and why, budget moved, campaign paused, page published, so the report is a record of decisions rather than a snapshot of metrics.
What happens next, specifically enough that you could hold us to it at the next review.
And a live dashboard you can open any day if you'd rather not wait. The monthly document exists because dashboards tell you what happened and not what it meant.
The first month.
Week one is audit and access, every account assessed on one basis, tracking unified, and a baseline recorded before anything changes.
Week two the rebuilt paid accounts go live and the first content and social batch is produced for your approval.
Weeks three and four are the first real data, and the first budget movements based on it rather than on assumption.
By the end of month one you have a single report covering everything, a declared set of targets, and a director who can answer any question about any channel without checking with someone else.
Month to month after that, cancellable with 30 days' notice. We'd rather earn the next month than hold you to a year.
Five stars on Google. Every single one.
In a very competitive personal injury works, MBC made fast & effective strategies to get instant results. Not “impressions” but actual calls. Outstanding company.
We've used MBC Group for marketing, SEO, and social media posting for several months now. Their responsiveness is amazing. Matt and his team have built something special that doesn't even compare to other companies.
It's always hard to find a company that really sees you as a partner. MBC however is exactly that for me. MBC consistently goes out of their way to put my company first.
Smashburger · TRAX Analytics · Design Source · R2 Medical Clinic · Accendo Wellness · Roof Evolution · Pink Flamingo Lawn Services · Shield Funding · The Rail Yard · Turf Surgeons · Beltranscapes · NuIQ · Techniques Hair Shop · WideBase · Magnolia & Mint · Shelf Love · Station 6 Over 9 · YOLO TOLO · Doggy Dog World Rescue · Roundtable Labs · Juicy Marketing · Events @ Piney Creek · Estevez Realtor · The Situation Room
Flat monthly, no commission.
One flat monthly fee, quoted before we start, plus ad spend paid directly to the platforms. 0% commission on spend. Running all channels together costs less than buying them separately, which is most of the point.
Questions we get asked.
{{ f.a }}
Find out where you actually stand.
A free 30-minute session with a marketing director. We'll look at your current search, social & paid, tell you what's holding it back, and give you an exact monthly number.
Run the free AI Visibility Report first →